Category Archives: American Civil War

Freedom: The Underground Railroad – Board Game

Freedom: The Underground Railroad is a board game from Academy Games it deals with a very dark topic in history, slavery in the US in the period 1800-1865. I can understand why some people will be very uncomfortable about combining board games which are typically about fun with topics like slavery. But have a look as I examine the game and the history it is based on.

Continue reading

War History Festival – Experience 2000 Years of Warfare

This past weekend (June 17-18) Oplevelsescenter Vestvolden (Experience Centre Western Ramparts) hosted an amazing event, “The War History Festival”. I believe it is the first of its kind in Denmark. it took place over Saturday and half of Sunday, it is a pity it is not any longer but it is cut short Sunday to allow the organisers to strike camp and head home as most are volunteers. The setting is very unique, it is a museum which is built into the old fortifications that protected Copenhagen. These were built during the late 19th century.

The festival itself took place along a 1.2 km path which runs along the bunkers. it consisted of a number of reenactment camps from groups all over Denmark. it was all free and the volunteers did an amazing job. The camps were laid out in chronological order, starting with Roman soldiers and ending with Soviet special forces. Every camp has a year assigned to it, I was there with the historical fencing club representing 1570.

I have been in contact with a few reenactment groups in Denmark but I had no idea that reenactment was this big. There was everything from Roman legionaries, vikings, historical fencing, 1807 (Napoleonic Wars), 1864 Schleswig War and American Civil War, WWI Germans and WWII both British and Germans represented as well as 1962 Soviets with plenty of vehicles.

KrigshistoriskFestivalFlyerBILLEDE-300x214.jpg

Early draft, as more and more reenactment groups joined, camps were added or removed

 

Can You Celebrate War?

A festival over war history  seems like such a contradiction. How can we celebrate the killing of others? It could easily sound like a way to romanticize or glorify war but I believe it is quite on the contrary. For us to understand history we need to get into the mind of people who lived in those times because otherwise we shall never be able to understand it. If we only apply our modern thinking and ethics, we will naturally simplify and draw wrong conclusions. To understand how slavery could exist for thousands of years as an institution, we need to understand how people in those times thought, not simply brush it off as but we have gotten smarter, more modern etc.

I therefore believe that a gathering of reenactment groups like this is an important way of getting people a little bit closer to what life would have been like. Reenactment I feel is still very small in Denmark although growing. It is important not to confuse it with role-playing. While role playing is about dressing up and sometimes in historical periods, the role playing is more about creating a story with villains and heroes. Reenactment is about living history. It is the recreation of a life style and mind-set through trying to feel in on your own body. In history books we are often only concerned with the broad lines, the generals and the big battles, but forget the ordinary soldier.

Reenactment for me is the rediscovery of history. It allows us to feel and understand the daily life of ordinary people. Most reenactment concentrates on war I personally believe it is because often we humans are drawn towards the conflict, the tearing of societies and the drama, because of the contrasts and questions that those pose to us, how would we have reacted, what was it like?

So I do not feel we try to celebrate war itself, rather, we try to understand strength and horror of the people who lived in trying times.

 

 

Reenactors in Denmark

One of the things I liked about the festival was the big turnout of reenactor groups. many of these I did not even know existed. I only managed to talk to a few of the reenactors and as a presenter myself, I unfortunately did not have a chance to talk to that many other but i wanted to highlight a few.

For American Civil War “Blue and Gray” put on a very good fight show on Sunday. I believe the roar of cannons were something that really shook the audience. The spectacle of deafening noise and nauseating smell of powder is something that cannot be understood from movies. This is where I truly feel reenactment comes into its true potential. Blue and Gray is particularly interesting because they try to portray companies which had large contingents of Scandinavian immigrants so although we are far from the battlefields of 1860s USA there is still a connection to Denmark.

“Regimentet” is a group that portrays the ordinary occupation troops in Denmark during WWII and were represented under 1940 (the year of the invasion). The dedication to details of these reenactors is amazing. I have thought to join them more than once.

Other WWII groups were “WWII Tommies” portraying British troops under WWII and “Danforce”. “Danforce” deserves a lot of attention as they represent a unit that many people may not even have heard about. During WWII a Danish force was formed in neutral Sweden and stood ready to enter back into Denmark. This force certainly deserves a blog post here at a later stage being almost forgotten.

“Westfront 1916” is a WWI reenactment group, I did not managed to get to speak with them but I think it is very interesting, specially because Denmark was not part of WWI.

^B3AB737C4FBE65978EED40A03D166A5B13FE7DFFEDFDAF1077^pimgpsh_fullsize_distr.jpg

The German WWI camp with field hospital

1570

Copenhagen Historical Fencing Club (KHFK) was present at the festival under the year 1570. Now that year was not chosen for any particular event or war but rather by a book: “Art of Combat” by Joachim Meier. He was a German fencing master and in that year published a very comprehensive book on a number of different weapons such as longsword and early rapier among others.

It is a real honour to be invited to the event as I feel we are slightly off as we are not reenactors as such. KHFK practices HEMA (Historical European Martial Arts) which is an umbrella term for recreating European fighting based on old manuscripts (which is where Meier is so important). Many of the manuals do however not focus on war, rather they focus on the duel or self-defence is being attacked in a more day-to-day life setting. This means that the person defending himself typically only have what he would practically and comfortable be carrying. So that means no armour, as a normal person would likely not go shopping wearing an armour and also it means weapons have to be easy to carry, typically what could be carried hanging from a belt (that keeps both hands free for all the regular daily stuff). A good example is the shield, while it was recognised that a shield was very useful, a big shield, simply was not practical and would likely have to be carried on the back, meaning it was slow to get out and its was a burden to carry for the odd chance of getting robbed. Bucklers are much smaller shields which can be carried suspended from a belt (see below for pictures).

Fighting an armoured opponent is a different game and generally not covered in our ways of training as it is very difficult to simulate in full contact sparring. To defeat armour one has to stab at the openings where the armour does not protect and that is inherently very dangerous and no safe way of doing that has yet been found.

 

For our stand it consisted of two parts; a weapon display over which we could talk and a fighting area, where we would show off sparring. While the weather was lovely for an outdoor event, I also thought it killed off a bit of enthusiasm for fighting in a thick fencing jacket as it gets really warm. With longsword and sword and buckler (small round shield) generally being the most popular in the fencing club and no other rapier fencers, I decided to rather show and tell than fight.

 

Fencing in the Spot Light

For me as a participant I love to show off simple ideas and treat misunderstandings. While I would love to get more advanced I also know that it is likely too difficult to grasp as many people would not have held a steel blade before.

KHFK Longsword.jpg

Learning to handle the sword and do foot work

I managed to teach a bit of basic stance and foot work, that can be taught in short 5 minute lessons which is about the attention span of a 5 year old when there are so many other things going on. I find that only the most basic stuff does well if attempting to teach.

There is a lot of footwork and stance involved in fencing, so it actually a good place to start. The feet are typically placed at a 90 degree angle, so I can move back and forth without stumbling over my own feet, also if I need to move in a hurry. I like to bend in the knees to get a good stable position to fight from. If fighting with weapons that only has a simple cross guard such as the “two-handed” longsword or medieval arming swords, the sword hand is generally held back unless attacking or defending. With weapons with more complex hand protection weapons are usually held out in front of me for reach. I believe such things are easy to grasp and convey and serves as great appetizers if people are interested.

While we gathered a good crowd over the whole day, I think the biggest exciment for people was to be allowed to hold the weapons. Swords to most people are surprisingly light although wielding them often seems a bit of exercise, that is because most modern people to not use their underarms very much any more but those are actually some of the muscles used most for swinging. Weapons themselves are around 1 kg for one-handed swords (some a bit lighter and some a bit heavier), humans around the world and across history may have varied in size but that seems a good weight. Longswords are used mostly in two hands and weigh around 1.5 kg.

DSC00022

A bit of weapon maintenance after the show. All these weapons are one handed weapons at a weight of around 1 kg. Note the small shield known as a buckler

Links at the bottom for more on HEMA.

 

Special Thanks

Thank to Oplevelsescenter Vestvolden for hosting the event. I am looking forward to next year (the dates will be June 16-17). I really hope this will be a yearly event going forward. It was great fun presenting and great to see so many other people being so passionate about reenactment.

Some suggestions for next year, it would be better if the audience was guided more into the camps either by a presenter or sign posts. While the path is lush, green and beautiful, it is flanked by ditches which makes a natural barrier to the audience and people are reluctant to cross. I would like to invite the audience more into the camps for more interaction. For the battle recreations, better speaker systems around the whole battle area would be great, it is some very good presentations but hard to hear over the noise of battles. Also perhaps try to give key reenactors a microphone such as commanders, I know it does not look great but it would help the audience understand.

See you next year!

 

 

Links:

For more on Oplevelsescenter Vestvolden see:

KHF 2023

 

For more information about Copenhagen Historical Fencing Club, visit the club at http://www.KHFK.dk

 

A lot more information on HEMA can be found on my previous blog posts:

HEMA at the Copenhagen Medieval Market

Historical Fencing and HEMA

Angel Island and the Chinese Exclusion Act

As my life continues to be really busy I find it hard to find the time to make in depth reviews of different things. I am currently planning a big trip to South Korea and Japan and I will of course post pictures and blog spots on what I learn from there. For now I will continue with coming up with little known history but fear not, I will get back to Napoleonic cavalry too. But for now follow me to discover a bit more unknown history.

 

In 2013 I was sent to California to attend a course of innovation and change management at Berkeley and of course being me I decided to arrive early and explore San Francisco however San Francisco does not have a lot of military history, there are the ships like the Liberty ship Jeremiah O’Brien and USS Pampanito and I did visit O’Brien but I have been on a few submarines and I must admit I cannot relate to them. USS Hornet did I unfortunately not have time to visit although a WWII aircraft carrier is high on my list. I however turned my attention to the islands in the bay and when everyone says island and San Francisco Alcatraz springs to mind. I did visit Alcatraz as I find it a mandatory part of a visit but I want to talk about another island, Angel Island.

 

Military Garrison

DSC01359Angel Island was named so by the Spanish explorers who first brought a European presence to the area. Prior to this the island that been used as a fishing and hunting ground by native Americans. Following colonizaion the island along with a lot of the area was used for cattle ranching but with the advent of the American Civil War the Union generals became worried that Confederate raiders would attack San Francisco and decided to build two gun batteries to protect the island. This was later augmented by an infantry garrison which became known as Camp Reynolds (later known as West Garrison). This garrison played an active part in the later subjugation of the Native Americans in the West.

Late in the 19th century the whole island was designated military zone and named “Fort McDowell”. The island was expanded with another garrison on the East side.

In 1891 a quarantine station was also opened on the island and the island was used to process embarking or discharging troops that had served overseas in the Spanish-Amiercan War and later WWI. The quarantine station would later develop into the other functions and from 1910 to 1940 the island was used as an immigration station.

DSC01303.JPG

Immigation Station

In 1848 the Califoria Gold Rush began and it was followed by vast construction projects such as the transcontinental railroad and new towns and the need for labour soared. During these times Chinese labourers were accepted (and somewhat tolerated) as the need for labour for outstripped supplies but as the gold began to wane so did the need for labour. Those Chinese already in the US now started to move to cities where they settled in enclaves or Chinatowns and took up the cheap labour and still more Chinese arrived hoping for a better life in the US. White protesters feared that Chinese were undercutting white labour and started lobbying against them and already in 1856 the state of California proposed a legislation that make it illegal for any of “Chinese or Mongolean races” to enter the state but was overruled by the supreme court. Still animosity towards the Asians gew and in 1879 the state of California adopted a new law which banned employment of Chinese in any state governments and by 1882 it had escalated into the Chinese Exclusion Act. Under this act and its admendments in 1884 Chinese were prohibited from entering the US and those already present in the country needed to obtain certificates of residence or face deportation. The laws were purely based on racial concerns as emigration of other nationalities were fully accepted. In 1923 the act was expanded to include other Asian nationalities.The_only_one_barred_out_cph.3b48680

Angel Island became an immigration station where immigrants entering the United States were detained and interrogated and more importantly served as a holding or detention facility. The detention facility was considered ideal because of its isolated location, making it very easy to control migrants, enforce the new immigration laws as well as any outbreaks of disease but also had the cruelty of being located in sight of San Francisco, the place of hope and a new life for many of the emigrants who were in some cases held for up to 2 years.

DSC01180

Administation Building

Upon arriving the the first stop on the island was the administration building, where men were separated from women and children. This was followed a medical examition, which included humiliating aspects like undressing in front of strangers and being probed and prodded. During the medical exams, individuals were also tested for various diseases and parasitic infections. If at any time during the exam an individual failed they would be deported immediately or hospitalized at their own expense. After the examinations, the immigrants were assigned a detention dormitory and a bunk where they waited until the interrogation process. Some individuals expressed their fears and frustrations through messages left on the barrack walls, which are still visible today.DSC01185.JPG

The problem was that only immigrants who had family in the U.S. would be allowed to enter the country and this gave rise to both human smuggling and a great deal of false paperwork which had to be thoroughly investigated by authorities. Successfuld immigrants did produce manuals on passing the interogations but these would be illegal and possession of one a likely cause for deportation.

The goal of Angel Island was to deport as many immigrants as possible and interogations were often tough and the same question were often asks again and again over several days to catch the applicant in a lie. As a result, the interrogation process was established to be very difficult and grueling to weed out the fraudulent individuals. Over the course of a few hours or days, the individual would be drilled with specific questions that only real applicants would know about, such as, family history, describing their homes etc. These things could of course be memorized and so to ensure that the applicant was telling the truth, witnesses from the United States, often other family members, could be called to give their version as well. If any doubt the interogation process was prolonged and any deviations would put not only the applicant but also other family members appearing as witnesses at risk.

The dream of America gave rise to the concept of “paper sons” or “paper daughters” as children of citizens are also considered U.S. citizens regardless of place of birth. The term paper therefore describe a fraudulent act were the incentive was monetary rather than any real family connection.

DSC01188DSC01189

Those that failed these tests often feared the familial shame of returning to China, and would commit suicide before leaving, or on the ships back to their homeland and some 30% of applicants were deported back to China.

 

WWII and Beyond

At the outbreak of WWII the facilities on the island was greatly expanded but it soon became clear that Angel Island could not contain all the activities required in the San Francisco area. Instead the island served as a POW camp and the detention facilities that previously housed immigrants were covered to hold Japanese prisoners of war.  In 1943 with the U.S. and the Chinese government allied the Chinese Exclussion Act was finally repealed. After the war the military packed up and left in 1947 leaving most of the island a state park however a small curiosity is that from 1954 to 1961 a Nike missile battery was operated on the island. While most of the battery has been removed and the landscape restored to original conditions a few traces can be found. The Nike system was a anti-air line of sight guided missile system used during the Cold War.

DSC01256DSC01257

The beautiful nature and the anonimity of Angel Island makes it the perfect spot to make a light day with a bit of walking. I very much enjoyed it for relaxing my brain after a busy training week, it is highly recommendable of the buzzle of SF gets too much.

 

Hope you enjoyed the post and stay tuned. I will be back in a 6 weeks time with more interesting stuff..

Gettysburg 1863 , Meeting Engagements and Demonstration Games

The Battle of Gettysburg in 1863 was a turning point in the civil war although few people grasped it at the time.

It was a case of a battle that neither side really wanted but happened as the vanguard of both armies stumbled across each other and as both sides called for reinforcements the battle escalated. That is in military terms called a “meeting engagement” and in war gaming terms that often means a game with reserves arriving from off table in a more or less random fashion which makes for a rapid changing intense type of game as both sides gain local superiority as their reserves arrive but then pushed back as the enemy gets his reinforcements.

In my early days when I viewed war gaming simply as a different way of playing chess and thus cared much more about the competitive nature of war gaming, I was never a big fan of meeting engagements exactly because if its randomness, I have come to appreciate it for its ability to develop a good narrative which is far more engaging and memorable to watch or participate int than a more well executed battle plan which newcomers may not even grasp or fully appreciate due to a lack of understanding of the game. I therefore tend to do more and more meeting engagement style scenarios.

I have always been fascinated by the Battle at Gettysburg ever since I came across the movie of the same name from 1993 and it inspired me to write a wargaming scenario, see:

Gettysburg 1863 – Day 1

As the battle escalated into a more set piece battle which my limited hobby space does not allow for, so what I normally do is focus on a tiny piece of the battlefield which I consider the point of decision but for Gettysburg day 1 I wanted to approach it a bit different. As I have dived into Black Powder by Warlord Games I also want to use the games as demonstration/participation games to get other people into the game and thus a meeting engagement is absolutely brilliant. Each new force that arrives can be commanded by a new player. Gettysburg is no different.

During the day before the battle general Buford’s union cavalry arrived in Gettysburg, while Buford’s troops had been observed they were misidentified as militia and believed to be easily swept aside. The first phase is therefore Buford defending against an infantry division led by general Heth, as Heth was making head way, general Reynold’s Union I Corps arrived and pushed Heth back, in the afternoon the rebels were reinforced from a different direction with the arrival of general Ewell but Union general Howard was also rushing up XI Corps, so that would make for a good participation game for 3 players on each side.

The three phases would each allow a new player to watch and learn and then take command:

Buford vs Heth

Reynolds (could be split in divisions) vs Heth with Rodes and Pender arrriving in support

Howard vs Ewell (possibly splt into divisions)